What made the train cars constitutional?

What made the train cars constitutional?

Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 “providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races.” The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in …

Who is the audience of the Louisiana railway Accommodations Act?

The law required that all railroads operating in the state provide “equal but separate accommodations” for white and African American passengers and prohibited passengers from entering accommodations other than those to which they had been assigned on the basis of their… …

What is the main idea of the Louisiana railway Accommodations Act?

An Act to promote the comfort of passengers on railway trains; requiring all railway companies carrying passengers on their trains, in this State, to provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing separate coaches or compartments so as to secure separate accommodations; defining …

What stopped Plessy vs Ferguson?

Plessy v Ferguson thus became universally known as the “separate but equal law.” This law sanctioned the segregation of public accommodations throughout much of the nation. It was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

What did the term separate but equal mean?

separate but equal. The doctrine that racial segregation is constitutional as long as the facilities provided for blacks and whites are roughly equal.

What effect did the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v Ferguson have on the nation?

On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that separate-but-equal facilities were constitutional. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the principle of racial segregation over the next half-century.

Which Supreme Court case overturned the Plessy v Ferguson decision?

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka

Who argued in front of the Supreme Court that separate by nature is not equal?

Judge John H. Ferguson